this article has made me angry. specifically the fifth paragraph.
i didn't realise that being gay had any affect on diving ability. the don't have to say "openly straight stephanie rice" when they talk about her medals, so why mention it in this instance?
i'm very happy that matthew has been able to come out, and hopefully he is as accepted in the australian team as every other member. however, in terms of this article, it's completely irrelevant information.
Sunday, 24 August 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
3 comments:
I know right? I saw that and I was like, "That's considered news?" Who gives a shit, seriously. It's 2008 ffs.
Kind of looks like it's been fixed so I've no idea what you're talking about. Still, since when does anything with “Fox” in the title constitute “news” at all — let alone objective & credible in any sense of the words?
They changed it! It must not have been just me who got offended by it. Basically the sentence "Mitcham was in shock over his win last night." had "Openly homosexual" at the start.
But yes, I understand what you mean about Fox and their news-tainment.
Post a Comment